Windows 11 22000.100 or Vanilla?

[FLCL]

Hi Nuhi ,

with the new NTlite 2.2 Update we get the 10.0.22000.100 support.
Do we need exactly this Iso to work with NTlite or is it ok to use the Vanilla 22000.1 Iso and let NTlite integrate the .100 Update?

Greetings

 

[newcomer]

i just used Ntlite for a Win11.
Still testing everything and Win11 just looks bland atm. I am sure I will make it more user friendly but I am not a fan of it at this time

 

[FLCL]

That don't answers my question

 

[Taosd]

Hi Nuhi ,

with the new NTlite 2.2 Update we get the 10.0.22000.100 support.
Do we need exactly this Iso to work with NTlite or is it ok to use the Vanilla 22000.1 Iso and let NTlite integrate the .100 Update?

Greetings

either im reading this wrong or im getting confused in my old age. are you saying you want to intergrate the 22000.100 cummulative update to the 22000.1 iso ? isnt that really the same thing ?

 

[FLCL]

Thats the question...especially cause this Win11 thing is new.

 

[Taosd]

Thats the question...especially cause this Win11 thing is new.

so you want to update the iso with an update that is already in place. theres no need to

 

[crypticus]

download updated from uupdump.

 

[newcomer]

download updated from uupdump.

 

[nuhi]

It's always best to download .1 (once with UUP, no fixes applied, can edit that in its ini files before starting the script).
Then you can fetch only the individual updates in the future from UUP "All Files", don't forget the PSF and servicing stack.

Then integrate with NTLite, it does support always up to the listed version, will edit the site a bit to reflect that.

 

[FLCL]

Thx Nuhi,
thats what I wanted to hear .