Who knows where ReviOS was created?

Status
Not open for further replies.
NTLite forum isn't the right place to promote pre-made ISO's from other projects or individuals. They're releasing Windows w/o permission, and their primary goal isn't for you to learn their tweaks. Sources which share customization scripts are better, because you can see their changes and remove those you don't agree with.

If you want to inspect a saved image, use NTLite's /forcelistcomponents /saveallstates
https://www.ntlite.com/community/index.php?threads/make-a-xml-out-of-a-existing-iso.1958/
 
They disabled WU, and expect you to DISM install updates & lang packs. Friendly folks...

ReviOS Summary:
- W11 Pro 22000.651
- standard component removals
- kept drivers & fonts (good!)
- stripped Features On Demand of localized apps (they instruct you to download languages yourself)
- disabled tons of event logs, services & extra services
- ton of reg tweaks (those known to NTLite)

Another low-latency FPS build. Without details, hard to copy the tweaks.
 
Last edited:
revios ggos checked every single damn iso on the internet in hopes to learn some new things but sorry they are all useless, not safe, not well thought. anyone who really knows ntlite and some reg tricks can create a better one.

the problem with them generally are;
tons of reg tweaks (lots of them are not working or not for win10 or w11)
removing drivers and fonts (not safe)
disabling components (not flexible enough for everyone, iso can't be tailor made, also problems with WU if enabled, if not enabled bigger problems)
not enough details (not safe)
too many 3rd party things (dirty)
 
And every user we got will say the same thing. By all means check out a frankenbuild to see what they have done then cherry pick the best bits for your own build.
 
Unless ms gives us a pure performance orientated rtm os that doesnt include any crap, only needed drivers languages and keyboards installed, as per iso region, en-us en-gb etc. Even then we will still find something to piss n moan about View attachment 7197
Absolutely correct :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top