For nuhi :
If I understand it correctly, we need to be processing images in either Win 8.1 or Win 10 (not Win 7) due to some difference in DISM handling?
And so there are some things that NTLite can do when running under Win 8.1 or 10 as Host, that NTLite cannot do when Win 7 is the Host.
Whatever the underlying difference, this started me thinking about whether there are negative consequences to processing a Live Win 7 installation?
Not that a Win 7 user has a choice. (Unless the user wants to go through the effort of capturing an image, post-processing it and then replacing the image. Which I don't.)
But I thought it is an interesting question to ask. If there are limitations, are they posted somewhere?
(Edit: I see that "Windows 7 SP1 requires the SHA2 update (KB4474419) for NTLite to start." But I'm asking about any other limitations. (I also found a post by Clanger, to the effect that one cannot update a Win10 image using Win7 as a Host. But I'm not asking about that either.))
If I understand it correctly, we need to be processing images in either Win 8.1 or Win 10 (not Win 7) due to some difference in DISM handling?
And so there are some things that NTLite can do when running under Win 8.1 or 10 as Host, that NTLite cannot do when Win 7 is the Host.
Whatever the underlying difference, this started me thinking about whether there are negative consequences to processing a Live Win 7 installation?
Not that a Win 7 user has a choice. (Unless the user wants to go through the effort of capturing an image, post-processing it and then replacing the image. Which I don't.)
But I thought it is an interesting question to ask. If there are limitations, are they posted somewhere?
(Edit: I see that "Windows 7 SP1 requires the SHA2 update (KB4474419) for NTLite to start." But I'm asking about any other limitations. (I also found a post by Clanger, to the effect that one cannot update a Win10 image using Win7 as a Host. But I'm not asking about that either.))
Last edited: