Windows 10 LTSC 1809 - Optimize Gaming/Poweruser/Runtime Profile, retaining maximum compatibility. For x64/UEFI systems
- Thread starter MT_
- Start date
- Status
Nice for people that have same issue!
I personally avoid any bluetooth related stuff, Logitech new wireless mice also use proprietary wifi stuff that just shows up as general HID Device and require no additional driver overhead.
But glad you got this fixed!
Are you talking about somehow connecting without the logitech usb dongle?
No, it still has a dongle, but everything is sent to usb controller from dongle as if it were to be a regular wired mouse.
The wireless part is solely between the dongle and mouse, after that usb just recognizes it as a generic usb hid mouse device.
Much more efficient than having a whole bluetooth system running for just a bluetooth mouse.
Something less related to all this but quite noteworthy to add, their new tech 'Lightspeed' is also way less prone to wireless interference vs regular bluetooth mice.
Finally suited even for competitive gaming.
Cheapest one is afaik G305 where the price isn't even a consideration compared to what you get!
ps: Not really very knowledged about BT, so take it with a grain of salt
The wireless part is solely between the dongle and mouse, after that usb just recognizes it as a generic usb hid mouse device.
Much more efficient than having a whole bluetooth system running for just a bluetooth mouse.
Something less related to all this but quite noteworthy to add, their new tech 'Lightspeed' is also way less prone to wireless interference vs regular bluetooth mice.
Finally suited even for competitive gaming.
Cheapest one is afaik G305 where the price isn't even a consideration compared to what you get!
ps: Not really very knowledged about BT, so take it with a grain of salt
Last edited:
Ok. I'm not really using this for gaming so it's a bit different. I actually do have a mouse like that but I wanted to free a USB port on a laptop and there was no adverse effects on system latency. Win10 is actually pretty much on par with Win7 concerning latency with this mod.
I think the interrupt affinity policy tool might also be worth considering (for gamers too). Here's a good video:
Edit: You actually had that tool in the first message. I had just missed/forgotten about it. Still, this is a good video to watch.
I think the interrupt affinity policy tool might also be worth considering (for gamers too). Here's a good video:
Edit: You actually had that tool in the first message. I had just missed/forgotten about it. Still, this is a good video to watch.
Last edited:
Haha yeah!
Mhhh I've tried it many times, and theoretically its sound.
I havent really seen any improvements in practical scenarios, only very minor in statistic tools on an idle system.
I think it can be more beneficial once you have 8 or more cores at your disposal to work with to see any benefit in more real world workloads.
Once I upgrade my quad core ill definitely tinker around with it.
Mhhh I've tried it many times, and theoretically its sound.
I havent really seen any improvements in practical scenarios, only very minor in statistic tools on an idle system.
I think it can be more beneficial once you have 8 or more cores at your disposal to work with to see any benefit in more real world workloads.
Once I upgrade my quad core ill definitely tinker around with it.
Last edited:
Network Connection Broker the principle would be only for UWP apps but Microsoft is making everything dependent on its UWP ecosystem
NTLite states that Components-Hardware-Devices Flow is needed for Bluetooth (actually Bluetooth is deeper in that menu) so it makes sense that the service is needed. As far as I have been able to test DevicesFlow is needed at least for the bluetooth connection menu (otherwise it will crash on opening). As far as Network Connection Broker I have no idea. I just tested enabling services and after enabling that BT was able to actually make a working connection. I double checked all of this.
Yea I'm thinking of holding off for now. Neither Intel's current/next gen nor Ryzen really blows me away with core count as exception. I would gain literally nothing on single threaded speed either.
Also the only AM4 Motherboard out there that has no stupid fan on it costs more than 700 euros, its rediculous really. I see it as a big weak point and not so easy to replace vs a simple case fan.
Yea all X570 Ryzen boards are active cooled, the only one that isn't is 700+ .....
If we knew exactly the performance gains of Zen 2, I could reconsider... as then it might be a worthy upgrade for a long time to come.
i did a little test on an a10 7890k, render the same audio file in reaper at 100mhz steps from 3.1ghx to 4.3ghz, the difference was 3 seconds. hardly worth panicking over, and the speeds? 3.1 was the a8 7600 base clock and 4.3 was the max i could push the 7890 to, price difference was 80quid. spend an extra 80 quid for 3 seconds? balls to that. my 8300(locked at 3.7ghx) and 2400 ram, sweet. the guy who runs the rockit delidder site said the 8300 is a decent gaming chip(possibly underrated too, i cant remember exactly). he knows more than so i accept his word.
if you need more cores because you do very intensive workloads then fine, if you plan to go from an old 4 core to a new 4 core and the old still works, keep it till it blows. i have my eye on stuff that can run 7 and or 8.1, no doubt a certain company(handing out bungs) will try to stop that on 10 and 11th gen. dellrefurbished have a ton of acceptable 7 and 8.1 laptops, i havnt looked at desktops. 10 can go screw itself.
if you need more cores because you do very intensive workloads then fine, if you plan to go from an old 4 core to a new 4 core and the old still works, keep it till it blows. i have my eye on stuff that can run 7 and or 8.1, no doubt a certain company(handing out bungs) will try to stop that on 10 and 11th gen. dellrefurbished have a ton of acceptable 7 and 8.1 laptops, i havnt looked at desktops. 10 can go screw itself.
Last edited:
MT_ ryzen 4000 looks compatible with older chipsets. i stuck with kaveri/godavari because they ran xp and i was happy with them, i'll stick to 8 and 9th gen for the same reasons, 7 and 8.1. theres a 50/50 chance i will die before the hardware does
Last edited:
Yea you can compare all the additive (kernel) driver/services since 150x builds, or 8, or even 7 and realise most of it is junk that isnt necessary at all.
Still, this profile isnt perfected. I use my own live script these days to finetune my original LTSC iso, but it can definitely not be worse than any stock build!
Last edited:
MT_ ryzen 4000 looks compatible with older chipsets. i stuck with kaveri/godavari because they ran xp and i was happy with them, i'll stick to 8 and 9th gen for the same reasons, 7 and 8.1. theres a 50/50 chance i will die before the hardware does
I pulled the trigger and went with 9900KF + MSI MEG Z390 ACE mobo. Should be arriving any day now
AMD made great strides, but some aspects of it haven't convinced me. If Zen 2 really goes miles ahead in any aspect, ill probably reconsider
Last edited:
and we once thought that xp was bloated
I have a shrink wrapped copy of Windows 1.0, redeemed from purchasing the Intel Above Board (2MB). I'm sure you'll want to remove the drivers, notepad, calculator, calendar, Write, and reversi. Then it might fit on two 3.5" HD floppies. /s
- Status